Search found 3550 matches
- Sat Apr 13, 2024 7:34 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: PureBasic v6.10 is producing a file size 5 times bigger than v6.04
- Replies: 19
- Views: 917
Re: PureBasic v6.10 is producing a file size 5 times bigger than v6.04
Read the release notes. It is a necessary improvement compiling with latest C libs. You can reduce the larger files somewhat using VS2022 link.exe.
- Sat Apr 13, 2024 2:59 pm
- Forum: Bugs - Windows
- Topic: Debug mode execution speed can vary on source whitespace.
- Replies: 12
- Views: 560
Re: Debug mode execution speed can vary on source whitespace.
Compile exe without debugger and report.
- Wed Apr 10, 2024 5:11 pm
- Forum: Announcement
- Topic: PureBasic 6.10 LTS is out !
- Replies: 325
- Views: 40334
Re: PureBasic 6.10 LTS is out !
As Psychophanta said, accuracy can be subjective. Search the forum for examples of math errors when mixing integers and floats. The results depend on the order of the algebraic expression and can be very hard to find. For floating point calculations, I prefix "0.0+" to force a floating poi...
- Wed Apr 10, 2024 1:46 pm
- Forum: Announcement
- Topic: PureBasic 6.10 LTS is out !
- Replies: 325
- Views: 40334
Re: PureBasic 6.10 LTS is out !
Not as simple as that obviously.
But, there are cases where algebraic rules vary from ideal. Or when asm and cbe compiles do not match. Or when a bug forces a change in scope.
These slow development and release of your app.
Size of the app exe is so far down the list it could be last.
But, there are cases where algebraic rules vary from ideal. Or when asm and cbe compiles do not match. Or when a bug forces a change in scope.
These slow development and release of your app.
Size of the app exe is so far down the list it could be last.
- Tue Apr 09, 2024 6:04 pm
- Forum: Announcement
- Topic: PureBasic 6.10 LTS is out !
- Replies: 325
- Views: 40334
Re: PureBasic 6.10 LTS is out !
My priority for EXE => accurate, fast, something I have not thought about yet, something else, size.
- Mon Apr 08, 2024 10:33 pm
- Forum: Bugs - C backend
- Topic: [Done] 6.10 Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
- Replies: 16
- Views: 751
Re: [6.10] Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
Haha, I blame it on an eclipse in my brain.
The workaround works. But, I have to search for these cases within my code. Not so fun.
The workaround works. But, I have to search for these cases within my code. Not so fun.
- Mon Apr 08, 2024 4:41 pm
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Windows 10 - PB10 - Linker error
- Replies: 10
- Views: 541
Re: Windows 10 - PB10 - Linker error
It is not desirable to overwrite a working app.exe while in development. The current way of storing to the source code folder is acceptable. Once you have confidence in your new app.exe, you can store it to your release folder. I have not had issues after whitelisting my dev folder and creating exe'...
- Mon Apr 08, 2024 3:44 pm
- Forum: Bugs - C backend
- Topic: [Done] 6.10 Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
- Replies: 16
- Views: 751
Re: [6.10] Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
Thanks, I tried the workaround but it depends on the position of the defining cache variable? :shock: EDIT: Actually, ASM and CBE fail if you define new_size and attempt to set it to a structured variable. If you cache the new size in a variable, it works for the time being EnableExplicit Structure ...
- Sat Apr 06, 2024 6:46 pm
- Forum: Bugs - C backend
- Topic: [Done] 6.10 Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
- Replies: 16
- Views: 751
Re: [6.10] Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
Haha, that was why I had trouble making a smaller code snippet. I used a local variable.
- Sat Apr 06, 2024 2:57 pm
- Forum: Bugs - C backend
- Topic: [Done] 6.10 Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
- Replies: 16
- Views: 751
Re: [6.10] Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
Nice!
That makes more sense.
That makes more sense.
- Sat Apr 06, 2024 2:05 pm
- Forum: Bugs - C backend
- Topic: [Done] 6.10 Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
- Replies: 16
- Views: 751
Re: [6.10] Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
Thanks, I only caught this at vLTS.
I used each beta but not sure when it appeared.
I used each beta but not sure when it appeared.
- Fri Apr 05, 2024 9:47 pm
- Forum: Bugs - C backend
- Topic: [Done] 6.10 Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
- Replies: 16
- Views: 751
Re: [6.10] Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
Ok, Here is smaller code that works with ASM but fails for CBE. Thanks juergenkulow, I did not see your post till now. EnableExplicit Structure testd numParm.i nPts.i EndStructure Structure db_CI Col$ EndStructure Structure db_TI nCols.i Array aCI.db_CI(0) EndStructure Structure sarr Array aTI.db_TI...
- Fri Apr 05, 2024 7:05 pm
- Forum: Bugs - C backend
- Topic: [Done] 6.10 Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
- Replies: 16
- Views: 751
Re: [6.10] Another ReDim error on deeper structured arrays
Ouch, same problem :( I cannot compile with CBE now. v6.10 ASM works but v6.10 CBE fails when accessing nested array: *d\aTI(itbl)\nCols = *TD\numParm *d\aTI(itbl)\DDL$ = #Empty$ *d\aTI(itbl)\Table$ = "TI" *d\aTI(itbl)\nCols = *TD\numParm *d\aTI(itbl)\nRows = *TD\nPts ReDim *d\aTI(itbl)\aC...
- Wed Apr 03, 2024 11:11 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests and Wishlists
- Topic: (Solved in 6.10) Close a minimized window (Win)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 170
Re: (Solved in 6.10) Close a minimized window (Win)
Thanks for post. Did not know this was fixed.
- Wed Apr 03, 2024 12:17 am
- Forum: 3D Programming
- Topic: Physics - Airplane
- Replies: 28
- Views: 6556
Re: Physics - Airplane
Really cool demo.