PureBasic Forums - English

Ok, is this the new behavior?
exe$ = UCase(PeekS(@Process\szExeFile, -1, #PB_Ascii)) ;<-- v611b1 syntax error but used to work.
exe$ = UCase(PeekS(@Process\szExeFile[0], -1, #PB_Ascii)) ;<-- v611b1 ok.

Structure Processentry32 field:
szExeFile.c[260]

Nice
My redim bug works.

Read the release notes. It is a necessary improvement compiling with latest C libs. You can reduce the larger files somewhat using VS2022 link.exe.

Compile exe without debugger and report.

As Psychophanta said, accuracy can be subjective. Search the forum for examples of math errors when mixing integers and floats. The results depend on the order of the algebraic expression and can be very hard to find. For floating point calculations, I prefix "0.0+" to force a floating poi...

Not as simple as that obviously.
But, there are cases where algebraic rules vary from ideal. Or when asm and cbe compiles do not match. Or when a bug forces a change in scope.

These slow development and release of your app.
Size of the app exe is so far down the list it could be last.

My priority for EXE => accurate, fast, something I have not thought about yet, something else, size.

Haha, I blame it on an eclipse in my brain.

The workaround works. But, I have to search for these cases within my code. Not so fun.

It is not desirable to overwrite a working app.exe while in development. The current way of storing to the source code folder is acceptable. Once you have confidence in your new app.exe, you can store it to your release folder. I have not had issues after whitelisting my dev folder and creating exe'...

Thanks, I tried the workaround but it depends on the position of the defining cache variable? :shock: EDIT: Actually, ASM and CBE fail if you define new_size and attempt to set it to a structured variable. If you cache the new size in a variable, it works for the time being EnableExplicit Structure ...

Haha, that was why I had trouble making a smaller code snippet. I used a local variable.

Nice!
That makes more sense.

Thanks, I only caught this at vLTS.
I used each beta but not sure when it appeared.

Ok, Here is smaller code that works with ASM but fails for CBE. Thanks juergenkulow, I did not see your post till now. EnableExplicit Structure testd numParm.i nPts.i EndStructure Structure db_CI Col$ EndStructure Structure db_TI nCols.i Array aCI.db_CI(0) EndStructure Structure sarr Array aTI.db_TI...

Ouch, same problem :( I cannot compile with CBE now. v6.10 ASM works but v6.10 CBE fails when accessing nested array: *d\aTI(itbl)\nCols = *TD\numParm *d\aTI(itbl)\DDL$ = #Empty$ *d\aTI(itbl)\Table$ = "TI" *d\aTI(itbl)\nCols = *TD\numParm *d\aTI(itbl)\nRows = *TD\nPts ReDim *d\aTI(itbl)\aC...