Rotate image/sprite 90 degrees? [resolved]

snap2000 · Post by **snap2000** » Thu Jun 24, 2004 4:25 am

It's possible to rotate an image 90 degrees, isn't it? If so, how might I?

Manolo · Post by **Manolo** » Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:55 am

See http://www.purearea.net/pb/english/index.htm
CodeArchiv
Rotate

Manolo

snap2000 · Post by **snap2000** » Thu Jun 24, 2004 9:36 am

Oh, man! That redraws the image pixel by pixel?

I think I'll work around this, then. :-X

edit: then again, I can do this with shapes, so why not try with sprites, eh?

LarsG · Post by **LarsG** » Thu Jun 24, 2004 12:12 pm

try 3D sprites..

Post by **Rings** » Thu Jun 24, 2004 12:36 pm

that is your solution,
viewtopic.php?t=11084

blueznl · Post by **blueznl** » Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:45 pm

plgblt_()

blueznl · Post by **blueznl** » Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:46 pm

you might want to explicitly mention the subject on the subject line, that's what it's there for...

GPI · Post by **GPI** » Thu Jun 24, 2004 4:52 pm

@snap2000

PLEASE! Make better Headlines. Everybody has a problem, a question or something like this.

In Your case:"How rotate a image by 90 Degree"

snap2000 · Post by **snap2000** » Fri Jun 25, 2004 2:02 am

LarsG wrote:try 3D sprites..

That I did, but the results were undesirable (though I rotated it and all just fine)

I ended up just creating more images, which was reinforced by the fact that my sprites have a little "3d" look to them, and rotating them conventionally screwed up that theme...

GPI: Sorry, I normally do that, but I've been doing this stuff at 12-2am, and my mind is a little sluggish at those hours.

blueznl · Post by **blueznl** » Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:59 am

well, you can still change it now...

snap2000 · Post by **snap2000** » Fri Jun 25, 2004 7:44 am

blueznl wrote:well, you can still change it now...

better?

Kale · Post by **Kale** » Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:34 am

snap2000 wrote: better?

Nope! You need to actually describe in short the problem or question in the subject line, not make it look like a crappy DBPro thread! 8O

snap2000 · Post by **snap2000** » Fri Jun 25, 2004 5:33 pm

Kale wrote:
snap2000 wrote: better?
Nope! You need to actually describe in short the problem or question in the subject line, not make it look like a crappy DBPro thread! 8O

But the problem is solved? Why bother explaining it now?

If someone were to do a search, there's always my post for the keywords/

Kale · Post by **Kale** » Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:17 pm

But the problem is solved? Why bother explaining it now?
If someone were to do a search, there's always my post for the keywords/

You could also argue why use code/quote/url/etc tags too? Its because it keeps everything nice and user friendly. We are all software engineers here of one kind or another, why make things difficult for other users, surely we strive for nice, friendly and efficient user interaction?

Also when you search for keywords the search results are entirely made up of subject headings, so i would have to click this thread just to find out wether or not it has any relevance to what i was searching for, instead of just quickly glancing at the subject line. I know this would only take something like 30-60 seconds to do but why not make it easy for people? Thank god there are very very few threads with non-discriptive subject lines or we all would be searching here for days!!!

Also when a problem has been solved, as in this case, this doesn't mean this thread is useless or old now. It means its another tutorial for someone else to find and use. We all have the awesome job of looking after the forum and to keep it a clean and user friendly vault of searchable information, after all, this forum is cited as one of PureBasic's strengths and a forum by which all others should be measured against.

snap2000 · Post by **snap2000** » Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:42 pm

Kale wrote:
But the problem is solved? Why bother explaining it now?
If someone were to do a search, there's always my post for the keywords/
You could also argue why use code/quote/url/etc tags too? Its because it keeps everything nice and user friendly. We are all software engineers here of one kind or another, why make things difficult for other users, surely we strive for nice, friendly and efficient user interaction?

Also when you search for keywords the search results are entirely made up of subject headings, so i would have to click this thread just to find out wether or not it has any relevance to what i was searching for, instead of just quickly glancing at the subject line. I know this would only take something like 30-60 seconds to do but why not make it easy for people? Thank god there are very very few threads with non-discriptive subject lines or we all would be searching here for days!!!

Also when a problem has been solved, as in this case, this doesn't mean this thread is useless or old now. It means its another tutorial for someone else to find and use. We all have the awesome job of looking after the forum and to keep it a clean and user friendly vault of searchable information, after all, this forum is cited as one of PureBasic's strengths and a forum by which all others should be measured against.

Ah, right. I am sorry for not thinking of that myself. I am ashamed.

PureBasic Forums - English

Rotate image/sprite 90 degrees? [resolved]

Rotate image/sprite 90 degrees? [resolved]

Re: Quick question