HTML5 Browser
Re: HTML5 Browser
What I'm finding a bit weird, behavior wise:
When I select an url from the drop-down button of the address bar,
the url isn't resolved immediately but you need to click into the
address bar field again.
Maybe this can be changed?
When I select an url from the drop-down button of the address bar,
the url isn't resolved immediately but you need to click into the
address bar field again.
Maybe this can be changed?
Re: HTML5 Browser
Thanks for the quick testLittle John wrote:Build 0.65.0.418 works fine.
Thanks for the quick fix!
Re: HTML5 Browser
Strange, a second click should not be needed. The behavior should be similar to Edge or IE.forumuser wrote:What I'm finding a bit weird, behavior wise:
When I select an url from the drop-down button of the address bar,
the url isn't resolved immediately but you need to click into the
address bar field again.
Maybe this can be changed?
Could you give more details on your Forkle and OS versions?
Did you start getting this issue with a specific Forkle build?
Re: HTML5 Browser
Windows Server 2012 R2 U4
This behavior was already there when I used 0.64.0.327
and I updated today to 0.65.0.418 and it's still the same.
Can't say if it existed before 0.64.0.327, though...
I'm using the non-security restricted version by renaming
forkle to forkle_nsc if this matters...
This behavior was already there when I used 0.64.0.327
and I updated today to 0.65.0.418 and it's still the same.
Can't say if it existed before 0.64.0.327, though...
I'm using the non-security restricted version by renaming
forkle to forkle_nsc if this matters...
Re: HTML5 Browser
Just thought you'd might like to know that someone (not me) mentioned it on Reddit today:firace wrote:I made a very simple (single-tab) HTML5 web browser.
https://www.reddit.com/r/software/comme ... e_browser/
I browse the "r/software" subreddit every day, which is why I saw it, and recognized the name (Forkle).
Re: HTML5 Browser
Hmm, hard to say, it might be a bug specific to Windows Server 2012...forumuser wrote:Windows Server 2012 R2 U4
This behavior was already there when I used 0.64.0.327
and I updated today to 0.65.0.418 and it's still the same.
Can't say if it existed before 0.64.0.327, though...
I'm using the non-security restricted version by renaming
forkle to forkle_nsc if this matters...
Is there any chance you can test it on a different machine/OS?
Re: HTML5 Browser
Thanks! Nice to know - even though it seems the post didn't get much attentionDude wrote:Just thought you'd might like to know that someone (not me) mentioned it on Reddit today:firace wrote:I made a very simple (single-tab) HTML5 web browser.
https://www.reddit.com/r/software/comme ... e_browser/
I browse the "r/software" subreddit every day, which is why I saw it, and recognized the name (Forkle).
Re: HTML5 Browser
It's only one day old.
Re: HTML5 Browser
@firace
Interesting. It works fine under Windows 7 x64 SP4 and Windows Server 2019 RS5
and... after creating a new VM with Windows 8.1 (the normal consumer edition of
Server 2012), even there.
So it really seems to be a problem just with Server 2012...
Interesting. It works fine under Windows 7 x64 SP4 and Windows Server 2019 RS5
and... after creating a new VM with Windows 8.1 (the normal consumer edition of
Server 2012), even there.
So it really seems to be a problem just with Server 2012...
Re: HTML5 Browser
I've added this to my issue list, in case I get a chance to play with a Server 2012 system at some point.forumuser wrote:@firace
Interesting. It works fine under Windows 7 x64 SP4 and Windows Server 2019 RS5
and... after creating a new VM with Windows 8.1 (the normal consumer edition of
Server 2012), even there.
So it really seems to be a problem just with Server 2012...
Thanks for the thorough testing
Re: HTML5 Browser
It's not quite ready for primetime anywayDude wrote:It's only one day old.
Even the application name could still change.
Re: HTML5 Browser
Would appreciate if some people could test the below WebGL Ocean demo in Forkle:
https://threejs.org/examples/webgl_shaders_ocean.html
Thanks for mentioning your OS version, if your system has a GPU, and if the demo runs smoothly.
(60FPS, smooth animation, CPU usage < 15%, RAM < 100MB)
https://threejs.org/examples/webgl_shaders_ocean.html
Thanks for mentioning your OS version, if your system has a GPU, and if the demo runs smoothly.
(60FPS, smooth animation, CPU usage < 15%, RAM < 100MB)
Re: HTML5 Browser
Server 2012 R2 U4Thanks for mentioning your OS version, if your system has a GPU, and if the demo runs smoothly.
GPU = NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Intel Core i5 3570K, 3.4 GHz
The demo runs smooth at 60 fps,
~10% CPU, ~32MB ram
-
- Addict
- Posts: 4527
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany
Re: HTML5 Browser
Tested with Forkle 0.65.0.418
OS: Windows 10 Pro 64 bit, version 1809
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4200M CPU @ 2.50GHz 64 bit
GPU: Intel(R) HD Graphics 4600
60 FPS, smooth animation, CPU usage ~ 11 %, RAM usage ~ 76 MB
Problem:
I wanted to get back to this forum page that contains the link by pressing [Alt]+[<-].
That did not work, so I was "captured" on the ocean demo page. The same already happened to me before when I viewed PDF files on the internet with Forkle. This is a serious flaw.
OS: Windows 10 Pro 64 bit, version 1809
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4200M CPU @ 2.50GHz 64 bit
GPU: Intel(R) HD Graphics 4600
60 FPS, smooth animation, CPU usage ~ 11 %, RAM usage ~ 76 MB
Problem:
I wanted to get back to this forum page that contains the link by pressing [Alt]+[<-].
That did not work, so I was "captured" on the ocean demo page. The same already happened to me before when I viewed PDF files on the internet with Forkle. This is a serious flaw.
-
- Addict
- Posts: 4527
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany
Re: HTML5 Browser
Translating selected text by pressing Ctrl + Shift + T is a very good idea. Thanks for that!
However, when I'm trying to translate English text, I always get a translation from English to English.
This is an example of a URL that Forkle generates:
I think it would be more suitable in most cases if Forkle would check the language of the user's system ("de" in my case), and then use that as the target language.
However, when I'm trying to translate English text, I always get a translation from English to English.
This is an example of a URL that Forkle generates:
"tl" probably means "target language", doesn't it?
I think it would be more suitable in most cases if Forkle would check the language of the user's system ("de" in my case), and then use that as the target language.