Installing PB 3.93 beta 1

Linux specific forum
DeeCee
User
User
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 11:14 pm

Post by DeeCee »

Polo wrote:
sec wrote:Trying to help ... I am not using Fedora though wink: ( i know other distro better).
It was not against you, don't worry, it was against the complexity of Linux :)
And of the fact that I think Linux is bloated without being bloated (my Mandrake take 2GB on the hard drive, but I still have to use sdl, gtk, ... to use Purebasic), hard to use and useless :)
Heh heh... not trying to start an argument here, but I just spent over 4 hours today trying to clean up the malware, spyware and other nasties from one of my co-worker's computer.... poor guy couldn't get a lick of work done from all the pop-ups and such. Personally, I'd trade security for complexity any day. :wink:
Which distro would you reccommend?

What I need is a Linux that is easy to install PB on, and so I can use the new IDE. Other than that I want Firefox 1.0.4 and Evolution. And preferably Gnome Wink Any good suggestions?
Give SimplyMepis a try: http://www.mepis.org/node/1462

It's free, easy and comes with just about everything a person could want. Then again, being a Debian based distro, adding and updating software is a piece of cake too. Finally, it has the best hareware recognition that I've *ever* seen on a Linux distro. It just works!

Edit: Doesn't come with the Gnome desktop though... I don't know for sure if you can add it.

-DeeCee-
User avatar
GeoTrail
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2794
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 12:45 am
Location: Bergen, Norway
Contact:

Post by GeoTrail »

Thanks DeeCee, sounds good. I'll have a look at that :)
I Stepped On A Cornflake!!! Now I'm A Cereal Killer!
sec
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 789
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 3:13 am
Location: 90-61-92 // EU or ASIA
Contact:

Post by sec »

Geotrail: Arch Linux is simple & clean (as Arch philosophy is KISS)
Dare2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3321
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 3:55 am
Location: Great Southern Land

Post by Dare2 »

sec wrote:Geotrail: Arch Linux is simple & clean (as Arch philosophy is KISS)
Hi sec,

Do you mean a simple and clean (pure) linux or do you mean easy to use - especially for those of us who are used to windows? Is the KISS bit keeping it simple and clean linux or simple because it does so much for you, like windows?

PS: I have heard that ubantu is very user oriented, and more window-ish than most.
@}--`--,-- A rose by any other name ..
User avatar
GeoTrail
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2794
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 12:45 am
Location: Bergen, Norway
Contact:

Post by GeoTrail »

Dare2 wrote:PS: I have heard that ubantu is very user oriented, and more window-ish than most.
I've been using Ubuntu abit and it's pretty similar to Mandrake and alike. If you want a really really userfriendly Windows like Linux I would say Xandros. Doesn't come any simpler then that. And the pay version comes with Crossover Office so you can run many Windows apps too.
I Stepped On A Cornflake!!! Now I'm A Cereal Killer!
sec
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 789
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 3:13 am
Location: 90-61-92 // EU or ASIA
Contact:

Post by sec »

Dare2 wrote:
sec wrote:Geotrail: Arch Linux is simple & clean (as Arch philosophy is KISS)
Hi sec,

Do you mean a simple and clean (pure) linux or do you mean easy to use - especially for those of us who are used to windows? Is the KISS bit keeping it simple and clean linux or simple because it does so much for you, like windows?

PS: I have heard that ubantu is very user oriented, and more window-ish than most.
Well, It is not a point 'n click distro so it is abit hard for starter.
Dare2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3321
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 3:55 am
Location: Great Southern Land

Post by Dare2 »

Hi guys,

Thanks. Starter = me :)

So far Fedora has been my most successful attempt to play with linux. I will look at Xandros. If it is more automated and no-brainer than Fedora, I already love it. :)
@}--`--,-- A rose by any other name ..
User avatar
GeoTrail
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2794
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 12:45 am
Location: Bergen, Norway
Contact:

Post by GeoTrail »

Trust me Dare2, if you want a distro easier than Xandros, you'll need a Linux secretary to do your job for you ;)
I Stepped On A Cornflake!!! Now I'm A Cereal Killer!
Dare2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3321
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 3:55 am
Location: Great Southern Land

Post by Dare2 »

GeoTrail wrote:Trust me Dare2, if you want a distro easier than Xandros, you'll need a Linux secretary to do your job for you ;)
LOL :D
@}--`--,-- A rose by any other name ..
Num3
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2810
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:51 pm
Location: Portugal, Lisbon
Contact:

Post by Num3 »

Ehehe...

I just installed Fedora 4 Core, everything seems fine, except for the fact the IDE doesn't work over here either :P

No errors, no alerts... It just doesn't run!

(I've changed permissions and all, but nada, niente, zip ...)
Num3
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2810
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:51 pm
Location: Portugal, Lisbon
Contact:

Post by Num3 »

sec wrote:so run this: :wink:
#yum install libstdc++ libstdc++-devel compat-libstdc++-296 compat-libstdc++-33
This just solved the problem!!!

I got it up & running, it just downloaded 300Kb from the net and all is ok now!

BTW: Why in hell is the IDE compiled using GTK 1.2 ? Why not GTK 2+ ?
Post Reply