PathRequester Gadget

Linux specific forum
Post Reply

Does PB for Linux need STDIN/STDOUT support?

Yes
10
50%
Yes
10
50%
No I'm happy to create lots of temporary files and use shell script wrappers to *simulate* STDIN/STDOUT
0
No votes
No I'm happy to create lots of temporary files and use shell script wrappers to *simulate* STDIN/STDOUT
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 20
naw
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:57 pm

PathRequester Gadget

Post by naw »

Hi,

The PathRequester Gadget compiles under PB, but returns a message that it isn't implemented yet - I know it's not a bug - just an incomplete implementation issue, but I'm in the middle of a project that needs it & I have to choose wether to try and do it some other way or wait a *few* weeks for PB3.7x for Linux (I'd rather wait).

Also (please, please, please Fred give us STDIN/OUT/ERR - at least STDIN support) this is a desperately needed function for PB Linux...
Ta - N
Top
Kale
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 3000
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 6:03 pm
Location: Lincoln, UK
Contact:
Contact Kale

Post by Kale »

Yes
No I'm happy to create lots of temporary files and use shell script wrappers to *simulate* STDIN/STDOUT
I wish this would be implemented in win32 aswell. I would love to use a more elegant way to handle pipes. :) Fred?
--Kale

Image
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Linux”