Got an idea for enhancing PureBasic? New command(s) you'd like to see?
-
netmaestro
- PureBasic Bullfrog
- Posts: 8425
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:42 am
- Location: Fort Nelson, BC, Canada
Post
by netmaestro »
made a typo, sorry. fixed it.
BERESHEIT
-
Trond
- Always Here
- Posts: 7446
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 6:45 pm
- Location: Norway
Post
by Trond »
netmaestro wrote:made a typo, sorry. fixed it.
No problem, That's the point of using a macro, so you don't have to fumble with PeekS and make typos.
-
einander
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 2:09 am
- Location: Spain (Galicia)
Post
by einander »
Trond:
My mistake: you are right. Your macros are faster.
From now on, I'll adopt your first macro.
Cheers
To be fast, one must race against the fast racers.
-
tinman
- PureBasic Expert
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 4:56 pm
- Location: Level 5 of Robot Hell
-
Contact:
Post
by tinman »
Only about a year late, but I'd also like to see the 2 parameter version of the command :)
If you paint your butt blue and glue the hole shut you just themed your ass but lost the functionality.
(WinXPhSP3 PB5.20b14)
-
Kaeru Gaman
- Addict
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 1:57 pm
- Location: Germany
Post
by Kaeru Gaman »
didn't see it before, either.
the third parameter optional would be nice.
even C64's basic had it....
oh... and have a nice day.
-
Olli
- Addict
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2020 12:26 pm
Post
by Olli »
I think the object of this subject has been done.
-
Josh
- Addict
- Posts: 1183
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:45 pm
Post
by Josh »
Olli wrote:I think the object of this subject has been done.
And for this message you have to reawaken a thread from 2007?
sorry for my bad english