I don't think that solves the issue. DLLs are still binaries and heurstics will scan them. But maybe it is worth a try. If it works we just found a new approach to send viruses and start them using rundll.exeskywalk wrote:Another approach is compile your PB code to dll, and build app with approved compilers.
Symantec again false positive
- NicTheQuick
- Addict
- Posts: 1226
- Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 7:43 pm
- Location: Germany, Saarbrücken
- Contact:
Re: Symantec again false positive
The english grammar is freeware, you can use it freely - But it's not Open Source, i.e. you can not change it or publish it in altered way.
Re: Symantec again false positive
Haha, yes, my implication is that an approved/elevated installer will instantiate the approved exe and its supporting dll, img, db's, etc.
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
- Kwai chang caine
- Always Here
- Posts: 5353
- Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:42 pm
- Location: Lyon - France
Re: Symantec again false positive
I saw that without debugger, there are most less notifications
So for the moment, for test all your codes....no "cockroach" button
Justly my administrator called me, there is just a little moment
And i believe he have understand my problem...so i hope
Fortunately, i have keep the 4 mails of SYMANTEC for proof my good faith and a ScreenShot of VirusTotal site with only the great SYMANTEC (and some little AV) who see my exe is a virus
Perhaps with that i can have a VM or a SandBox.....
So for the moment, for test all your codes....no "cockroach" button
Justly my administrator called me, there is just a little moment
And i believe he have understand my problem...so i hope
Fortunately, i have keep the 4 mails of SYMANTEC for proof my good faith and a ScreenShot of VirusTotal site with only the great SYMANTEC (and some little AV) who see my exe is a virus
Perhaps with that i can have a VM or a SandBox.....
The happiness is a road...
Not a destination
Not a destination