PropertyViewer [canceled]

Fluid Byte · Post by **Fluid Byte** » Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:38 pm

Alright, I finally hacked something together wich I think is worth releasing now. I tried to implement item folding the whole weekend but I failed totally. Anyhow I promised to release the source either it's done or not. So here it is but it's anything else than complete (for my personal taste). It's still missing item folding and keyboard navigation. But what it does up to now, it does fairly good and should be enough for most people.

Screenshot:

Ok, the demo code goes first:

Code: Select all

*** removed ***

Please test this intensely and report any bugs so I can improve this ASAP.

Fluid Byte · Post by **Fluid Byte** » Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:38 pm

October 16, 2007:

- fixed a memory leak

Content of PropertyViewer.pbi:

Code: Select all

*** removed ***

rsts · Post by **rsts** » Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:45 pm

Wow.

First class Mr Byte.

Thanks for sharing.

milan1612 · Post by **milan1612** » Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:31 pm

Woohoo, finally!

Big thanks to you!

srod · Post by **srod** » Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:51 pm

Very nice indeed.

Thanks.

DoubleDutch · Post by **DoubleDutch** » Sun Oct 14, 2007 8:57 pm

Thanks

Maybe the problems you encountered just need a pair of fresh eyes. Sometimes when you look at code a lot it gets hard to see something that may be obvious.

Droopy · Post by **Droopy** » Sun Oct 14, 2007 9:40 pm

Usefull, thanks

nicolaus · Post by **nicolaus** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:00 am

Very nice but i cant compile your example.
I have a IMA in the Procedure "PROV_AddParent()" at the line " *prvp = AllocateMemory(SizeOf(PROV_PARENT)) ".

I work with Windows XP SP2 (without XP Style) and PB 4.02

regards,
Nico

milan1612 · Post by **milan1612** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:15 am

Strange, I have exactly the same configuration and it compiles without problems...

Fluid Byte · Post by **Fluid Byte** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:37 am

Nicolaus, wich PB Version do you use? I use the latest Beta 4 for testing.

byo · Post by **byo** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:06 pm

Wow, this is amazing!

And a great PB study!

I've been looking for something like this.
Thanks a lot for this contribution!

.

#NULL · Post by **#NULL** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:12 pm

@fluid byte
4.02, he said.
i tried with 4.02 too. no problems. same system as nicolaus.

< captious: >

i cant compile your example.
I have a IMA

that's contradictory.
so you can compile, but it doesn't run as it should.

dontmailme · Post by **dontmailme** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:58 pm

Nice

byo · Post by **byo** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:51 pm

So maybe some of the pros here can help improve the code by adding item folding and keyboard navigation as mentioned?

.

Fluid Byte · Post by **Fluid Byte** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:56 pm

byo wrote:So maybe some of the pros here can help improve the code by adding item folding and keyboard navigation as mentioned?

They can't because my code is hard to read.

I hate it anyway if other peeps mess around with the code and release changes wich I can't reproduce in detail. So no worries. I will integrate item folding (and possible bugfixes) as soon as possible. So the user don't have be concerned about anything but hitting F5.