It is currently Thu Dec 12, 2019 10:21 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: PB 5.70 Almost Working
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 12:26 pm 
Offline
User
User

Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2018 9:23 am
Posts: 40
Location: Australia
Having battled through dependency hell, I now have PB 5.70 installed and almost working on a new KDE box.
I have abandoned the idea of trying to start PB from launch.sh because the terminal run error messages are endless.
The PB IDE appears to fire up OK when started from the executable in the compiler directory, but attempting to run any of the included examples produces exactly the same Compile Warning:

Waiting for executable to start...
Executable type: Linux - x64 (64bit, Unicode)
Executable started.
[WARNING] Gadget.pb (Line: 1)
[WARNING] GLib-GIO (DEBUG): _g_io_module_get_default: Found default implementation gvfs (GDaemonVfs) for â??gio-vfsâ??
The Program execution has finished.

Why a warning is generated for (Line: 1) is a mystery because all the included code examples start with nothing more than a single remark (ie. a ; semicolon) on line 1.
Does anyone have an idea what might cause the second "GLib-GIO" warning to be generated?

Any thoughts or pointers would be welcome.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: PB 5.70 Almost Working
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 2:35 pm 
Offline
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 7:09 pm
Posts: 247
Location: (Madrid) Spain
Have you tried to change the source file codification and test? utf-8, latin, etc...
An assembler compiler gave me errors for this, maybe you could rule out this kind of problem, maybe not.

_________________
[:: PB Registered ::]

Win10 Intel core i5-3330 8GB RAM Nvidia GTX 1050Ti


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: PB 5.70 Almost Working
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 4:54 pm 
Offline
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:17 pm
Posts: 302
Location: Germany
As a general remark after many years of developing - dont let it discourage you right away if you get an unbelievable amount of linking errors. Since computer software is sometimes extremely hierarchically dependant, it often does'nt mean as much as it seems. I have seen people regularly get totally discouraged by something simple, due to this. Then you look closer and fix the first problem and suddenly the amount of errors massively drops. You really have to look closer at what the first few problem(s) are.

_________________
webpage


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

 


Powered by phpBB © 2008 phpBB Group
subSilver+ theme by Canver Software, sponsor Sanal Modifiye