PureBasic 3.93 for Windows released

Developed or developing a new product in PureBasic? Tell the world about it.
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

PureBasic 3.93 for Windows released

Post by Fred »

Here it is, the final version of the long bug fix release for Windows. We hope it has solved as much problems as possible and you will enjoy it. You can grab it on your accounts or just use smart updater. Big thank you to all the guys which helped us to make it possible ;). For the full list of change, just consult the history.

Have fun,

The PureBasic Team.
zikitrake
Addict
Addict
Posts: 834
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 2:15 pm
Location: Spain

Post by zikitrake »

Congratulations! Thanks to you and to your team :D
traumatic
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: PureBasic 3.93 for Windows released

Post by traumatic »

Congrats!
Thank you! :D


Hmm... sorry but somthing seems to be wrong:
The update is 7.2MB while the full version is only 6.4 ?
Good programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, should be hard to read.
DarkDragon
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2218
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by DarkDragon »

I posted it into the german forum :wink: . @traumatic: seems that you have credits in the help file:
- Aktualisiert: Interface-Importer und DirectX9 Interfaces in den Residents (danke an Traumatic!)
!?! :lol: :( :? :shock: :cry: :D ?!?
I also want a credit :P .

Btw.: Why is in the www.purebasic.com title "PureBasic : visual basic compiler"??? PureBasic is definately not Visual Basic.
bye,
Daniel
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5881
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

purebasic isnt a visual basic compiler? what is it then? its not a visual pascal compiler is it???
DarkDragon
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2218
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by DarkDragon »

thefool wrote:purebasic isnt a visual basic compiler? what is it then? its not a visual pascal compiler is it???
it is a basic compiler. Visual Basic is a own language.
bye,
Daniel
User avatar
J. Baker
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2178
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:12 am
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by J. Baker »

Thanks!!! :D
www.posemotion.com

PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef

Mac: 10.13.6 / 1.4GHz Core 2 Duo / 2GB DDR3 / Nvidia 320M
PC: Win 7 / AMD 64 4000+ / 3GB DDR / Nvidia 720GT


Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Fred »

traumatic: that's because the .zip compression is definitely worste than the cool lzma one used in the installshield.

darkdragon: it's not 'Visual Basic compiler' it's 'visual basic compiler' ;). Let's PureBasic do some more hits on Google... and it has a Visual Designer no ? 8)
User avatar
blueznl
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 6161
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 11:31 am
Contact:

Post by blueznl »

that' marketing :-)
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
User avatar
Rescator
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1769
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 5:05 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Rescator »

Installshield huh? doesn't that cost some cash for licensing?

Myself I prefer NSIS (by Nullsoft), it's free and darn good. (and the overhead is tiny)
And it also support lzma *grin*
traumatic
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by traumatic »

Fred wrote:traumatic: that's because the .zip compression is definitely worste than the cool lzma one used in the installshield.
Yes, thanks. After downloading both I saw why ;)

Thanks again for this great release!!
Good programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, should be hard to read.
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5881
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

@fred: exactly my thought :D
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

> Installshield huh? doesn't that cost some cash for licensing?

Don't know. But I do know that I kept getting prompts that some files
were read-only... one was in the Examples folder, and another in the
LibMaker one (I think). A bit annoying... makes for a slower install,
because I didn't see the first prompt until I got back to my PC after
starting the install. :?
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
freedimension
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 613
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 2:50 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by freedimension »

Installshield? Where? The last time I updated was via Smart Updated.

I hate Installshield because it also installs a background task/service/whatever that is intended for checking if there are Updates for Programs. Problem here: I have no choice, I even get no warning and last but not least I don't want or need this additional Software.
<°)))o><²³
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Fred »

It's not installshield, it's InnoSetup: a free, very good installshield like software.
Post Reply